PSP5

Overview

Amundi PEA S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (PSP5) tracks the S&P 500 index synthetically, through a swap agreement rather than by holding the constituents, and is managed by Amundi. Dividends are reinvested inside the fund rather than paid out, so PSP5 suits investors building a position over time. The fund is domiciled in FR, which determines the withholding tax treatment applied to its dividends. Annual charges come to 0.15% of assets, and the fund holds 1.5B under management. Over five years the fund returned 13.1% a year on average, against 21.6% over three years. It is eligible for the French PEA, and can also be held in a securities account or a German Depot. Its risk level is rated medium. Launched on 2014-09-10, the fund is denominated in EUR and has 12 years of track record. It is a UCITS fund, so it follows the European framework on diversification, liquidity and asset segregation. Because PSP5 accumulates, nothing is taxed while the shares are held: the charge falls on disposal, against your capital gains allowance in a general account, and not at all inside an ISA or a SIPP. Domicile in FR sets the withholding the fund itself suffers on the dividends it receives, a cost absent from the stated fee but present in the return.

Ongoing charges of 0.15% place this fund 78th of 225 comparable funds, whose median is 0.20%. On £10,000 that costs about 15 a year and 150 over ten years at a constant amount, deducted daily and never visible on a statement: it shows up in the gap between the fund's return and its index's. At this level, neither low enough to be an argument nor high enough to be an obstacle, the decision rests elsewhere: on the index tracked, on the distribution policy, and on what your broker charges to buy.

This fund tracks S&P 500 through a swap: it does not hold the index constituents but a collateral basket, and exchanges that basket's return for the index's with a bank. Two consequences are real. It introduces counterparty risk, bounded by collateral revalued daily and by regulation, but not zero. And it makes possible what direct holding cannot: tracking an index closed to direct purchase, or avoiding withholding tax on dividends, which is why a synthetic fund sometimes beats its physical twin after tax. The swap's cost does not appear in the ongoing charge; it shows up in tracking difference measured over several years.

The fund is domiciled in FR, outside the two usual homes for European listed funds. Three checks come before buying: whether your broker lists it, since a fund outside the usual venues is not always dealable from a European account; what withholding the fund suffers on dividends it receives, which follows FR's treaties rather than your country's; and how your own tax authority treats it, an answer that can differ from the treatment of an Irish fund tracking the same index.

Income is accumulated: dividends from the holdings are reinvested inside the fund rather than paid out. In a taxable account that defers taxation to the moment of sale instead of triggering it annually, leaving the whole return at work, and that is the main advantage of this share class. Two qualifications go with it. A holder who needs income has to sell units to obtain it, which is one more decision to take and sometimes at a bad moment. And the deferral is not universal: some countries tax a notional annual return whatever the distribution policy, in which case the accumulating class changes nothing.

With 1.5 billion in assets and 12 years of history, this fund has the size and the record that make closure unlikely and the spread narrow. Three checks remain, once a year, none of which depends on the market. The ongoing charge, which an issuer revises without notice and whose gap to a competitor can invert. The tracking difference, the only figure that says whether replication stays faithful. And the methodology of S&P 500, which can change its selection or weighting rules without the fund's name moving, in which case what you hold has changed with nothing to announce it.

S&P 500 applies a non-financial screen, and the first thing to establish is which one: a simple exclusion of a few activities leaves a portfolio very close to the starting index, while selecting the best-rated in each sector removes a large part of it. Both often carry the same kind of name. Two practical consequences: the deviation from the broad index becomes deliberate and can last for years, and the rating comes from a provider whose method changes, so the composition shifts without any public rule having moved. The exclusion list is in the prospectus, and that is the only document that binds.

Over one year the fund shows 18.2% against 13.1% annualised over five years: the recent year sits well above the long average. A gap in that direction mainly counsels care about the entry point, since what has risen sharply lately costs more today than a year ago, and the long average is the figure that best describes what to expect.

Contextual Analysis

Performance

Key Facts

Holdings

Risk

How to Buy This ETF

About this ETF

Similar ETFs