Skip to content

Search

Search ETFs, guides and pages

CSNDX

iShares·Nasdaq-100

iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Published by Radif Partners · Updated

IE00B53SZB19
TER 0.33%14.5B AUMUSDPhysicalAccUCITS
Simulate
+18.2%
1Y
+27.8%
3Y
+14.4%
5Y

Overview

iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX) tracks the Nasdaq-100 index and holds its constituents directly, a physical replication managed by iShares. Dividends are reinvested inside the fund rather than paid out, so CSNDX suits investors building a position over time. The fund is domiciled in IE, which determines the withholding tax treatment applied to its dividends. Annual charges come to 0.33% of assets, and the fund holds 14.5B under management. Over five years the fund returned 14.4% a year on average, against 27.8% over three years. It is not eligible for the French PEA, but can be held in a securities account, a UK ISA or a German Depot. Its risk level is rated high. Launched on 2010-01-26, the fund is denominated in USD and has 16 years of track record. It is a UCITS fund, so it follows the European framework on diversification, liquidity and asset segregation. Because CSNDX accumulates, nothing is taxed while the shares are held: the charge falls on disposal, against your capital gains allowance in a general account, and not at all inside an ISA or a SIPP. Domicile in IE sets the withholding the fund itself suffers on the dividends it receives, a cost absent from the stated fee but present in the return.

Ongoing charges of 0.33% place this fund 16th of 44 comparable funds, whose median is 0.40%. On £10,000 that costs about 33 a year and 330 over ten years at a constant amount, deducted daily and never visible on a statement: it shows up in the gap between the fund's return and its index's. At this level, neither low enough to be an argument nor high enough to be an obstacle, the decision rests elsewhere: on the index tracked, on the distribution policy, and on what your broker charges to buy.

Replication is physical: the fund actually holds the constituents of Nasdaq-100, which makes its contents verifiable line by line in the issuer's report. Two points deserve attention. Securities lending first, practised by most physical funds to reduce costs: it earns a few hundredths of a point and creates an exposure to the borrower, covered by collateral, with the annual report stating the proportion lent. Rebalancing second: every change in the index's composition forces the fund to buy and sell, and those internal costs are not in the 0.33% headline. That is why two funds at the same price do not track their index with the same fidelity.

The domicile, Ireland, is not an administrative detail: it determines the withholding tax the fund suffers on the dividends it receives, and that loss appears in no fee table. On US equities, the Ireland-US treaty cuts withholding from thirty to fifteen per cent, which on a world index is mechanically worth several tenths of a point a year and explains Irish dominance of this segment. For the holder, the UCITS framework also brings the key information document in their own language, diversification rules, and separation of the fund's assets from the issuer's.

Income is accumulated: dividends from the holdings are reinvested inside the fund rather than paid out. In a taxable account that defers taxation to the moment of sale instead of triggering it annually, leaving the whole return at work, and that is the main advantage of this share class. Two qualifications go with it. A holder who needs income has to sell units to obtain it, which is one more decision to take and sometimes at a bad moment. And the deferral is not universal: some countries tax a notional annual return whatever the distribution policy, in which case the accumulating class changes nothing.

With 14.5 billion in assets and 16 years of history, this fund has the size and the record that make closure unlikely and the spread narrow. Three checks remain, once a year, none of which depends on the market. The ongoing charge, which an issuer revises without notice and whose gap to a competitor can invert. The tracking difference, the only figure that says whether replication stays faithful. And the methodology of Nasdaq-100, which can change its selection or weighting rules without the fund's name moving, in which case what you hold has changed with nothing to announce it.

Nasdaq-100 is a broad index, and that is the building block most portfolios have reason to own before any other, for a simple reason: it requires no forecast. Two points deserve checking before calling it diversified. Cap weighting concentrates the portfolio on the largest companies, so the top ten holdings can make up a substantial share, and that concentration grows without any rule changing. And the geographic scope matters: a developed-world index leaves out emerging markets, while a broad US index is not global exposure despite the international revenue of the companies it holds.

Over one year the fund shows 18.2% and over five years 14.4% annualised, two figures close together, which is the most ordinary and least informative configuration: it does not say the fund is steady, only that the chosen start and end points resemble each other. Comparing these figures with another fund means something only if the index is the same; otherwise it is an index comparison dressed as a fund comparison.

TER

0.33%

Fund Size

14.5B

14,500M USD
Risk Level

High

Holdings

148

Replication

Physical

Distribution

Accumulating

Currency

USD

Domicile

IE

Index

Nasdaq-100

Provider

iShares

Inception

2010-01-26 (16 years)

Compliance
UCITS

Contextual Analysis

Fund Size

With 14.5B in assets, this is a large fund, good liquidity and tight spreads.

Fee Positioning

A TER of 0.33% is in line with the market average (~0.35%).

Track Record

Launched in 2010-01-26, this fund has 16 years of history, long and reliable track record.

Risk Profile

High risk, suited for long-term investors comfortable with volatility.

Performance

Returns Summary

PeriodAnn. ReturnCumulative
1 Month (est.)–+1.4%
3 Months (est.)–+4.3%
6 Months (est.)–+8.7%
YTD (est.)–+7.2%
1 Year+18.2%+18.2%
3 Years+27.8%+108.8%
5 Years+14.4%+95.8%
Since inception (16y)+20.1%+1779.5%

Key Facts

Fund Profile

IndexNasdaq-100
TER0.33%
Fund Size14.5B
CurrencyUSD
ReplicationPhysical
DistributionAccumulating
DomicileIE
Inception2010-01-26
Fund Age16 years
Holdings148
UCITSYes
PEA EligibleNo
ESGNo
Risk LevelHigh

Themes & Zones

Themes
Technology
Geographies
United States

Holdings

Risk

How to Buy This ETF

Select your country in the menu to see available brokers and wrappers.

About this ETF

The iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) tracks the Nasdaq-100 index. It is managed by iShares using physical replication and follows a accumulating distribution policy. The fund is denominated in USD and domiciled in IE. It has a total expense ratio (TER) of 0.33%.

Want to see how this ETF could grow over time with regular investments? Over a ten-year horizon the ongoing charge weighs more than any difference in past performance: 0.20% against 0.50% on €10,000 is about €300, compounded. Check the figure in the key information document of the exact share class your broker offers, since two classes of the same fund can differ on charges and on distribution policy.Simulate

Similar ETFs

Frequently asked questions

What do CSNDX's 0.33% charges actually cost?

They are taken from the fund's value continuously and never billed separately: on £1,000 invested that is about £3.30 a year and roughly £33 over ten years at a constant amount. That is the only cost of the fund itself. Your broker's commission and the spread between buying and selling price come on top, and they weigh most on small frequent purchases.

How do you buy CSNDX, and on which venue?

Through any broker that lists ISIN IE00B53SZB19. The same strategy often exists in several share classes with different fees and distribution policies, and what counts is the class you buy rather than the one you read about: check the ISIN, not the name. A limit order avoids paying the spread of a thin order book, particularly outside the trading hours of the underlying markets.

Is CSNDX genuinely diversified?

Less so than the number of holdings suggests. Nasdaq-100 weights its constituents by market capitalisation, so the largest companies make up a share of the fund far above their number, and that concentration deepens without any rule changing. The useful check is the weight of the top ten holdings, published monthly by iShares: that figure says how many companies the outcome actually depends on.

What should you re-check on CSNDX once a year?

Three things, none of which depends on the market. The ongoing charge, which an issuer revises without notice and whose gap to a competitor can invert. The tracking difference, the only figure that says whether replication stays faithful. And the methodology of Nasdaq-100, which can change its selection or weighting rules without the fund's name moving: in that case what you hold has changed with nothing to announce it.

Does CSNDX lend out the securities it holds?

Probably in part: most physical funds lend securities to reduce their costs, and iShares publishes the proportion in the annual report. Lending income is worth a few hundredths of a point, shared between the fund and the issuer. The risk is the borrower's, covered by collateral worth more than the amount lent, and it appears in the prospectus rather than in the stated fee.

This ranking is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Displayed performance is simulated.