DPYA
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
Published by Radif Partners · Updated
Overview
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPYA) tracks the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Dividend+ index and holds its constituents directly, a physical replication managed by iShares. Dividends are reinvested inside the fund rather than paid out, so DPYA suits investors building a position over time. The fund is domiciled in IE, which determines the withholding tax treatment applied to its dividends. Annual charges come to 0.59% of assets, and the fund holds 700M under management. Over five years the fund returned -1.0% a year on average, against 11.1% over three years. It is not eligible for the French PEA, but can be held in a securities account, a UK ISA or a German Depot. Its risk level is rated medium. Launched on 2019-04-26, the fund is denominated in USD and has 7 years of track record. It is a UCITS fund, so it follows the European framework on diversification, liquidity and asset segregation. Because DPYA accumulates, nothing is taxed while the shares are held: the charge falls on disposal, against your capital gains allowance in a general account, and not at all inside an ISA or a SIPP. Domicile in IE sets the withholding the fund itself suffers on the dividends it receives, a cost absent from the stated fee but present in the return.
At 0.59%, this fund costs more than twice the median of its category (0.25%) and over 8.4 times the cheapest (0.07%). On £10,000 the gap to the median is worth about 340 over ten years, and that difference is certain in a way no performance gap is. A premium can be justified, by an index no competitor tracks, by a useful trading currency, or by size that guarantees liquidity; it is not justified by the brand. The question is therefore plain: what does this fund offer that the cheapest on the list does not?
Replication is physical: the fund actually holds the constituents of FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Dividend+, which makes its contents verifiable line by line in the issuer's report. Two points deserve attention. Securities lending first, practised by most physical funds to reduce costs: it earns a few hundredths of a point and creates an exposure to the borrower, covered by collateral, with the annual report stating the proportion lent. Rebalancing second: every change in the index's composition forces the fund to buy and sell, and those internal costs are not in the 0.59% headline. That is why two funds at the same price do not track their index with the same fidelity.
The domicile, Ireland, is not an administrative detail: it determines the withholding tax the fund suffers on the dividends it receives, and that loss appears in no fee table. On US equities, the Ireland-US treaty cuts withholding from thirty to fifteen per cent, which on a world index is mechanically worth several tenths of a point a year and explains Irish dominance of this segment. For the holder, the UCITS framework also brings the key information document in their own language, diversification rules, and separation of the fund's assets from the issuer's.
Income is accumulated: dividends from the holdings are reinvested inside the fund rather than paid out. In a taxable account that defers taxation to the moment of sale instead of triggering it annually, leaving the whole return at work, and that is the main advantage of this share class. Two qualifications go with it. A holder who needs income has to sell units to obtain it, which is one more decision to take and sometimes at a bad moment. And the deferral is not universal: some countries tax a notional annual return whatever the distribution policy, in which case the accumulating class changes nothing.
With 700 million in assets and 7 years of history, this fund has the size and the record that make closure unlikely and the spread narrow. Three checks remain, once a year, none of which depends on the market. The ongoing charge, which an issuer revises without notice and whose gap to a competitor can invert. The tracking difference, the only figure that says whether replication stays faithful. And the methodology of FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Dividend+, which can change its selection or weighting rules without the fund's name moving, in which case what you hold has changed with nothing to announce it.
FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Dividend+ selects companies on their dividend, and that is an investment decision rather than a measurement. A high yield comes either from a solid payer or from a company whose price has fallen, and the screen does not always tell them apart: a yield index ends up mechanically overweight in the sectors that distribute heavily because they have little to reinvest. What counts is the selection rule, often several years of rising dividends, and the sector cap. A dividend, moreover, is not a return: it leaves the company and the price adjusts by as much.
Over one year the fund shows -0.4% and over five years -1.0% annualised, two figures close together, which is the most ordinary and least informative configuration: it does not say the fund is steady, only that the chosen start and end points resemble each other. Comparing these figures with another fund means something only if the index is the same; otherwise it is an index comparison dressed as a fund comparison.
0.59%
700M
700M USDMedium
267
Physical
Accumulating
USD
IE
FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Dividend+
iShares
2019-04-26 (7 years)
Contextual Analysis
Fund Size
With 700M in assets, this is a mid-sized fund, decent liquidity for most investors.
Fee Positioning
A TER of 0.59% is above the market average (~0.35%), justified if the strategy is specialized.
Track Record
Launched in 2019-04-26, this fund has 7 years of history, enough to evaluate consistency.
Risk Profile
Medium risk, good risk/return balance for a 5+ year horizon.
Performance
Returns Summary
| Period | Ann. Return | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Month (est.) | – | -0.0% |
| 3 Months (est.) | – | -0.1% |
| 6 Months (est.) | – | -0.2% |
| YTD (est.) | – | -0.2% |
| 1 Year | -0.4% | -0.4% |
| 3 Years | +11.1% | +37.0% |
| 5 Years | -1.0% | -5.1% |
| Since inception (7y) | +3.2% | +24.6% |
Key Facts
Fund Profile
Themes & Zones
Holdings
Risk
How to Buy This ETF
Select your country in the menu to see available brokers and wrappers.
About this ETF
The iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) tracks the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Dividend+ index. It is managed by iShares using physical replication and follows a accumulating distribution policy. The fund is denominated in USD and domiciled in IE. It has a total expense ratio (TER) of 0.59%.
Similar ETFs
Frequently asked questions
What do DPYA's 0.59% charges actually cost?
They are taken from the fund's value continuously and never billed separately: on £1,000 invested that is about £5.90 a year and roughly £59 over ten years at a constant amount. That is the only cost of the fund itself. Your broker's commission and the spread between buying and selling price come on top, and they weigh most on small frequent purchases.
What currency risk comes with DPYA?
The fund is denominated in USD, but the trading currency is not the risk: what counts is the currency in which the companies held earn their revenue. A euro-based investor therefore carries the gap between the euro and those currencies, and that gap appears in no return published in local currency. A hedged share class answers a different question, at a cost that varies with the interest rate gap.
How do you buy DPYA, and on which venue?
Through any broker that lists ISIN IE00BFM6T921. The same strategy often exists in several share classes with different fees and distribution policies, and what counts is the class you buy rather than the one you read about: check the ISIN, not the name. A limit order avoids paying the spread of a thin order book, particularly outside the trading hours of the underlying markets.
Is DPYA genuinely diversified?
Less so than the number of holdings suggests. FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Dividend+ weights its constituents by market capitalisation, so the largest companies make up a share of the fund far above their number, and that concentration deepens without any rule changing. The useful check is the weight of the top ten holdings, published monthly by iShares: that figure says how many companies the outcome actually depends on.
What should you re-check on DPYA once a year?
Three things, none of which depends on the market. The ongoing charge, which an issuer revises without notice and whose gap to a competitor can invert. The tracking difference, the only figure that says whether replication stays faithful. And the methodology of FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Dividend+, which can change its selection or weighting rules without the fund's name moving: in that case what you hold has changed with nothing to announce it.
This ranking is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Displayed performance is simulated.