INRG
iShares Global Clean Energy Transition UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
Published by Radif Partners · Updated
Overview
iShares Global Clean Energy Transition UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG) tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy Transition index and holds its constituents directly, a physical replication managed by iShares. Dividends are paid out to holders rather than reinvested, so INRG suits investors seeking regular income. The fund is domiciled in IE, which determines the withholding tax treatment applied to its dividends. Annual charges come to 0.65% of assets, and the fund holds 3.4B under management. Over five years the fund returned -6.2% a year on average, against 5.0% over three years. It is not eligible for the French PEA, but can be held in a securities account, a UK ISA or a German Depot. Its risk level is rated high. Launched on 2007-07-09, the fund is denominated in USD and has 19 years of track record. It is a UCITS fund, so it follows the European framework on diversification, liquidity and asset segregation. Because INRG distributes, every payment is taxable in the year it is received, against the dividend allowance in a general account, while it stays sheltered inside an ISA or a SIPP. Domicile in IE sets the withholding the fund itself suffers on the dividends it receives, a cost absent from the stated fee but present in the return.
Ongoing charges of 0.65% place this fund 6th of 8 comparable funds, whose median is 0.58%. On £10,000 that costs about 65 a year and 650 over ten years at a constant amount, deducted daily and never visible on a statement: it shows up in the gap between the fund's return and its index's. At this level, neither low enough to be an argument nor high enough to be an obstacle, the decision rests elsewhere: on the index tracked, on the distribution policy, and on what your broker charges to buy.
Replication is physical: the fund actually holds the constituents of S&P Global Clean Energy Transition, which makes its contents verifiable line by line in the issuer's report. Two points deserve attention. Securities lending first, practised by most physical funds to reduce costs: it earns a few hundredths of a point and creates an exposure to the borrower, covered by collateral, with the annual report stating the proportion lent. Rebalancing second: every change in the index's composition forces the fund to buy and sell, and those internal costs are not in the 0.65% headline. That is why two funds at the same price do not track their index with the same fidelity.
The domicile, Ireland, is not an administrative detail: it determines the withholding tax the fund suffers on the dividends it receives, and that loss appears in no fee table. On US equities, the Ireland-US treaty cuts withholding from thirty to fifteen per cent, which on a world index is mechanically worth several tenths of a point a year and explains Irish dominance of this segment. For the holder, the UCITS framework also brings the key information document in their own language, diversification rules, and separation of the fund's assets from the issuer's.
Income is distributed: the fund pays out the dividends it receives, usually one to four times a year. For a holder living off the portfolio that is what is wanted, since the income arrives without selling. For someone still accumulating it is a tax disadvantage in a taxable account: each payment is taxed in the year received, so the amount reinvested is reduced before it starts working again. Reinvesting by hand also costs a dealing commission each time and often leaves cash idle for want of the price of a whole unit. An accumulating class on the same index, where one exists, settles the question.
With 3.4 billion in assets and 19 years of history, this fund has the size and the record that make closure unlikely and the spread narrow. Three checks remain, once a year, none of which depends on the market. The ongoing charge, which an issuer revises without notice and whose gap to a competitor can invert. The tracking difference, the only figure that says whether replication stays faithful. And the methodology of S&P Global Clean Energy Transition, which can change its selection or weighting rules without the fund's name moving, in which case what you hold has changed with nothing to announce it.
S&P Global Clean Energy Transition is a sector index, and that is an explicit bet: the portfolio gives up diversification across sectors to take a position in one. Three consequences follow. Concentration first, often around twenty companies whose top three make up a notable share, so the outcome depends on identifiable firms. Internal correlation next, which defeats the idea of dampening risk within the sector. And timing last: a sector runs in long cycles, and entry rarely lands well when the purchase follows a strong rise already published.
Over one year the fund shows 1.5% against -6.2% annualised over five years: the recent year sits well above the long average. A gap in that direction mainly counsels care about the entry point, since what has risen sharply lately costs more today than a year ago, and the long average is the figure that best describes what to expect.
0.65%
3.4B
3,387M USDHigh
158
Physical
Distributing
USD
IE
S&P Global Clean Energy Transition
iShares
2007-07-09 (19 years)
Contextual Analysis
Fund Size
With 3.4B in assets, this is a large fund, good liquidity and tight spreads.
Fee Positioning
A TER of 0.65% is above the market average (~0.35%), justified if the strategy is specialized.
Track Record
Launched in 2007-07-09, this fund has 19 years of history, long and reliable track record.
Risk Profile
High risk, suited for long-term investors comfortable with volatility.
Performance
Returns Summary
| Period | Ann. Return | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Month (est.) | – | +0.1% |
| 3 Months (est.) | – | +0.4% |
| 6 Months (est.) | – | +0.7% |
| YTD (est.) | – | +0.6% |
| 1 Year | +1.5% | +1.5% |
| 3 Years | +5.0% | +15.9% |
| 5 Years | -6.2% | -27.3% |
| Since inception (19y) | +0.1% | +2.0% |
Key Facts
Fund Profile
Themes & Zones
Holdings
Risk
How to Buy This ETF
Select your country in the menu to see available brokers and wrappers.
About this ETF
The iShares Global Clean Energy Transition UCITS ETF USD (Dist) tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy Transition index. It is managed by iShares using physical replication and follows a distributing distribution policy. The fund is denominated in USD and domiciled in IE. It has a total expense ratio (TER) of 0.65%.
Similar ETFs
Frequently asked questions
What do INRG's 0.65% charges actually cost?
They are taken from the fund's value continuously and never billed separately: on £1,000 invested that is about £6.50 a year and roughly £65 over ten years at a constant amount. That is the only cost of the fund itself. Your broker's commission and the spread between buying and selling price come on top, and they weigh most on small frequent purchases.
Why does INRG's Irish domicile matter?
Because it determines the withholding tax the fund suffers on the dividends it receives, and that loss appears in no fee table. The Ireland-US treaty cuts withholding from thirty to fifteen per cent on US equities, mechanically worth several tenths of a point a year on a world index. The UCITS framework also brings the key information document in your own language.
Does INRG pay dividends?
Yes: the fund distributes and pays out the dividends it receives, on a calendar set by iShares. The payment is taxable in the year you receive it in most accounts, even if reinvested at once, and reinvesting by hand costs a commission each time. An accumulating class on the same index avoids that friction for anyone who does not need the income.
What currency risk comes with INRG?
The fund is denominated in USD, but the trading currency is not the risk: what counts is the currency in which the companies held earn their revenue. A euro-based investor therefore carries the gap between the euro and those currencies, and that gap appears in no return published in local currency. A hedged share class answers a different question, at a cost that varies with the interest rate gap.
What does INRG's non-financial screen actually remove?
It depends on the screen, and two very different arrangements carry the same kind of name. A simple exclusion of a few activities leaves a portfolio almost identical to the starting index; selecting the best-rated in each sector removes a large part of it. The exclusion list is in the prospectus, the only document that binds, and the rating comes from a provider whose method changes with no public rule moving.
This ranking is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Displayed performance is simulated.