Skip to content

Search

Search ETFs, guides and pages

MWRD

Amundi·MSCI World

Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR Acc

Published by Radif Partners · Updated

LU2655993207
TER 0.12%3.5B AUMEURPhysicalAccUCITSPEA
Simulate
+18.7%
1Y
–3Y
–5Y

Overview

Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR Acc (MWRD) tracks the MSCI World index and holds its constituents directly, a physical replication managed by Amundi. Dividends are reinvested inside the fund rather than paid out, so MWRD suits investors building a position over time. The fund is domiciled in LU, which determines the withholding tax treatment applied to its dividends. Annual charges come to 0.12% of assets, and the fund holds 3.5B under management. Over the past year the fund returned 18.7%, a history too short to judge it on. It is eligible for the French PEA, and can also be held in a securities account or a German Depot. Its risk level is rated medium. Launched on 2024-03-06, the fund is denominated in EUR and has 2 years of track record. It is a UCITS fund, so it follows the European framework on diversification, liquidity and asset segregation. Because MWRD accumulates, nothing is taxed while the shares are held: the charge falls on disposal, against your capital gains allowance in a general account, and not at all inside an ISA or a SIPP. Domicile in LU sets the withholding the fund itself suffers on the dividends it receives, a cost absent from the stated fee but present in the return.

Ongoing charges of 0.12% place this fund 68th of 225 comparable funds, whose median is 0.20%. On £10,000 that costs about 12 a year and 120 over ten years at a constant amount, deducted daily and never visible on a statement: it shows up in the gap between the fund's return and its index's. At this level, neither low enough to be an argument nor high enough to be an obstacle, the decision rests elsewhere: on the index tracked, on the distribution policy, and on what your broker charges to buy.

Replication is physical: the fund actually holds the constituents of MSCI World, which makes its contents verifiable line by line in the issuer's report. Two points deserve attention. Securities lending first, practised by most physical funds to reduce costs: it earns a few hundredths of a point and creates an exposure to the borrower, covered by collateral, with the annual report stating the proportion lent. Rebalancing second: every change in the index's composition forces the fund to buy and sell, and those internal costs are not in the 0.12% headline. That is why two funds at the same price do not track their index with the same fidelity.

The domicile, Luxembourg, is not an administrative detail: it determines the withholding tax the fund suffers on the dividends it receives, and that loss appears in no fee table. Luxembourg has a comparable treaty network but is not as favourable as Ireland on US equities, a difference visible on a world index and not on a European one. For the holder, the UCITS framework also brings the key information document in their own language, diversification rules, and separation of the fund's assets from the issuer's.

Income is accumulated: dividends from the holdings are reinvested inside the fund rather than paid out. In a taxable account that defers taxation to the moment of sale instead of triggering it annually, leaving the whole return at work, and that is the main advantage of this share class. Two qualifications go with it. A holder who needs income has to sell units to obtain it, which is one more decision to take and sometimes at a bad moment. And the deferral is not universal: some countries tax a notional annual return whatever the distribution policy, in which case the accumulating class changes nothing.

The fund is 2 years old, which is enough to judge its fees and its replication quality but not its behaviour: it has not been through a full cycle, and a since-launch return mostly measures the launch date. Without a tracking difference published over several years, the only available check is a month-by-month comparison with the index. With 3.5 billion in assets it has, on the other hand, passed the size at which early closure is the most likely outcome.

MSCI World is a broad index, and that is the building block most portfolios have reason to own before any other, for a simple reason: it requires no forecast. Two points deserve checking before calling it diversified. Cap weighting concentrates the portfolio on the largest companies, so the top ten holdings can make up a substantial share, and that concentration grows without any rule changing. And the geographic scope matters: a developed-world index leaves out emerging markets, while a broad US index is not global exposure despite the international revenue of the companies it holds.

The published returns for this fund are incomplete, and that is itself information: without a multi-year record, the only available check is the structure, the 0.12% ongoing charge, 3.5 billion in assets and the replication method. A recent or little-followed fund is not a bad fund for that reason, but it can only be judged on what is known in advance rather than on what it has done.

TER

0.12%

Fund Size

3.5B

3,500M EUR
Risk Level

Medium

Holdings

1,583

Replication

Physical

Distribution

Accumulating

Currency

EUR

Domicile

LU

Index

MSCI World

Provider

Amundi

Inception

2024-03-06 (2 years)

Compliance
UCITSPEA

Contextual Analysis

Fund Size

With 3.5B in assets, this is a large fund, good liquidity and tight spreads.

Fee Positioning

A TER of 0.12% is among the lowest on the market, excellent value.

Track Record

Launched in 2024-03-06, this fund is only 2 years old, limited track record.

Risk Profile

Medium risk, good risk/return balance for a 5+ year horizon.

Performance

Returns Summary

PeriodAnn. ReturnCumulative
1 Month (est.)–+1.4%
3 Months (est.)–+4.4%
6 Months (est.)–+8.9%
YTD (est.)–+7.4%
1 Year+18.7%+18.7%
3 Years––
5 Years––
Since inception (2y)+18.7%+40.9%

Key Facts

Fund Profile

IndexMSCI World
TER0.12%
Fund Size3.5B
CurrencyEUR
ReplicationPhysical
DistributionAccumulating
DomicileLU
Inception2024-03-06
Fund Age2 years
Holdings1,583
UCITSYes
PEA EligibleYes
ESGNo
Risk LevelMedium

Themes & Zones

Themes
Broad Market
Geographies
World

Holdings

Risk

How to Buy This ETF

Select your country in the menu to see available brokers and wrappers.

About this ETF

The Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR Acc tracks the MSCI World index. It is managed by Amundi using physical replication and follows a accumulating distribution policy. The fund is denominated in EUR and domiciled in LU. It has a total expense ratio (TER) of 0.12%.

Want to see how this ETF could grow over time with regular investments? Over a ten-year horizon the ongoing charge weighs more than any difference in past performance: 0.20% against 0.50% on €10,000 is about €300, compounded. Check the figure in the key information document of the exact share class your broker offers, since two classes of the same fund can differ on charges and on distribution policy.Simulate

Similar ETFs

Frequently asked questions

What do MWRD's 0.12% charges actually cost?

They are taken from the fund's value continuously and never billed separately: on £1,000 invested that is about £1.20 a year and roughly £12 over ten years at a constant amount. That is the only cost of the fund itself. Your broker's commission and the spread between buying and selling price come on top, and they weigh most on small frequent purchases.

Why does MWRD's Luxembourg domicile matter?

Because it determines the withholding tax the fund suffers on the dividends it receives, and that loss appears in no fee table. Luxembourg has a comparable treaty network but is less favourable than Ireland on US equities. The UCITS framework also brings the key information document in your own language.

Does MWRD pay dividends?

No: the fund accumulates, reinvesting the dividends of the companies it holds so that the unit price rises instead. In a taxable account that defers tax to the sale rather than triggering it annually. Anyone needing regular income has to sell units to obtain it, or choose a distributing class on the same index where one exists.

2 years of history: enough to judge MWRD?

To judge its fees and replication quality, yes. To judge its behaviour, no: the fund has not been through a full cycle, and a since-launch return mostly measures the launch date. What is already usable is the tracking difference compared with the ongoing charge, and the index itself, whose history is generally far longer than that of the fund replicating it.

Can MWRD be held in a French PEA?

This fund is flagged as eligible, which matters: inside a PEA no tax is triggered before withdrawal, and after five years gains escape income tax with only social levies remaining due. Two caveats: your broker's own list prevails over ours, and eligibility can be lost if the fund changes its composition, in which case the plan has to be regularised.

This ranking is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Displayed performance is simulated.