SMI

Overview

iShares SMI ETF (CH) (SMI) tracks the SMI index and holds its constituents directly, a physical replication managed by iShares. Dividends are paid out to holders rather than reinvested, so SMI suits investors seeking regular income. The fund is domiciled in CH, which determines the withholding tax treatment applied to its dividends. Annual charges come to 0.35% of assets, and the fund holds 2.5B under management. Its tracking difference against the index stands at +0.32 points, the gap an investor actually bears beyond the headline fee. Over five years the fund returned 3.5% a year on average, against 11.5% over three years. It is not eligible for the French PEA, but can be held in a securities account, a UK ISA or a German Depot. Its risk level is rated medium. Launched on 1999-10-06, the fund is denominated in CHF and has 27 years of track record. It is a UCITS fund, so it follows the European framework on diversification, liquidity and asset segregation. Because SMI distributes, every payment is taxable in the year it is received, against the dividend allowance in a general account, while it stays sheltered inside an ISA or a SIPP. Domicile in CH sets the withholding the fund itself suffers on the dividends it receives, a cost absent from the stated fee but present in the return.

Ongoing charges of 0.35% place this fund 167th of 225 comparable funds, whose median is 0.19%. On £10,000 that costs about 35 a year and 350 over ten years at a constant amount, deducted daily and never visible on a statement: it shows up in the gap between the fund's return and its index's. At this level, neither low enough to be an argument nor high enough to be an obstacle, the decision rests elsewhere: on the index tracked, on the distribution policy, and on what your broker charges to buy.

Replication is physical: the fund actually holds the constituents of SMI, which makes its contents verifiable line by line in the issuer's report. Two points deserve attention. Securities lending first, practised by most physical funds to reduce costs: it earns a few hundredths of a point and creates an exposure to the borrower, covered by collateral, with the annual report stating the proportion lent. Rebalancing second: every change in the index's composition forces the fund to buy and sell, and those internal costs are not in the 0.35% headline. That is why two funds at the same price do not track their index with the same fidelity.

The fund is domiciled in CH, outside the two usual homes for European listed funds. Three checks come before buying: whether your broker lists it, since a fund outside the usual venues is not always dealable from a European account; what withholding the fund suffers on dividends it receives, which follows CH's treaties rather than your country's; and how your own tax authority treats it, an answer that can differ from the treatment of an Irish fund tracking the same index.

Income is distributed: the fund pays out the dividends it receives, usually one to four times a year. For a holder living off the portfolio that is what is wanted, since the income arrives without selling. For someone still accumulating it is a tax disadvantage in a taxable account: each payment is taxed in the year received, so the amount reinvested is reduced before it starts working again. Reinvesting by hand also costs a dealing commission each time and often leaves cash idle for want of the price of a whole unit. An accumulating class on the same index, where one exists, settles the question.

With 2.5 billion in assets and 27 years of history, this fund has the size and the record that make closure unlikely and the spread narrow. Three checks remain, once a year, none of which depends on the market. The ongoing charge, which an issuer revises without notice and whose gap to a competitor can invert. The tracking difference, the only figure that says whether replication stays faithful, currently 0.32 points against 0.35% of fees. And the methodology of SMI, which can change its selection or weighting rules without the fund's name moving, in which case what you hold has changed with nothing to announce it.

SMI is a broad index, and that is the building block most portfolios have reason to own before any other, for a simple reason: it requires no forecast. Two points deserve checking before calling it diversified. Cap weighting concentrates the portfolio on the largest companies, so the top ten holdings can make up a substantial share, and that concentration grows without any rule changing. And the geographic scope matters: a developed-world index leaves out emerging markets, while a broad US index is not global exposure despite the international revenue of the companies it holds.

Over one year the fund shows 14.3% against 3.5% annualised over five years: the recent year sits well above the long average. A gap in that direction mainly counsels care about the entry point, since what has risen sharply lately costs more today than a year ago, and the long average is the figure that best describes what to expect. The tracking difference of 0.32 points is markedly wider than the 0.35% ongoing charge: the extra gap comes from elsewhere, withholding tax on dividends, internal transaction costs or the cost of a swap, and that is the figure to follow rather than the headline fee.

Contextual Analysis

Performance

Key Facts

Holdings

Risk

How to Buy This ETF

About this ETF

Similar ETFs