XMJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C
Published by Radif Partners · Updated
Overview
Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (XMJP) tracks the MSCI Japan index and holds its constituents directly, a physical replication managed by Xtrackers. Dividends are reinvested inside the fund rather than paid out, so XMJP suits investors building a position over time. The fund is domiciled in LU, which determines the withholding tax treatment applied to its dividends. Annual charges come to 0.12% of assets, and the fund holds 5.4B under management. Its tracking difference against the index stands at +0.38 points, the gap an investor actually bears beyond the headline fee. Over the past year the fund returned 20.6%, a history too short to judge it on. It is not eligible for the French PEA, but can be held in a securities account, a UK ISA or a German Depot. Its risk level is rated medium. Launched on 2007-01-09, the fund is denominated in USD and has 19 years of track record. It is a UCITS fund, so it follows the European framework on diversification, liquidity and asset segregation. Because XMJP accumulates, nothing is taxed while the shares are held: the charge falls on disposal, against your capital gains allowance in a general account, and not at all inside an ISA or a SIPP. Domicile in LU sets the withholding the fund itself suffers on the dividends it receives, a cost absent from the stated fee but present in the return.
Ongoing charges of 0.12% place this fund 68th of 225 comparable funds, whose median is 0.20%. On £10,000 that costs about 12 a year and 120 over ten years at a constant amount, deducted daily and never visible on a statement: it shows up in the gap between the fund's return and its index's. At this level, neither low enough to be an argument nor high enough to be an obstacle, the decision rests elsewhere: on the index tracked, on the distribution policy, and on what your broker charges to buy.
Replication is physical: the fund actually holds the constituents of MSCI Japan, which makes its contents verifiable line by line in the issuer's report. Two points deserve attention. Securities lending first, practised by most physical funds to reduce costs: it earns a few hundredths of a point and creates an exposure to the borrower, covered by collateral, with the annual report stating the proportion lent. Rebalancing second: every change in the index's composition forces the fund to buy and sell, and those internal costs are not in the 0.12% headline. That is why two funds at the same price do not track their index with the same fidelity.
The domicile, Luxembourg, is not an administrative detail: it determines the withholding tax the fund suffers on the dividends it receives, and that loss appears in no fee table. Luxembourg has a comparable treaty network but is not as favourable as Ireland on US equities, a difference visible on a world index and not on a European one. For the holder, the UCITS framework also brings the key information document in their own language, diversification rules, and separation of the fund's assets from the issuer's.
Income is accumulated: dividends from the holdings are reinvested inside the fund rather than paid out. In a taxable account that defers taxation to the moment of sale instead of triggering it annually, leaving the whole return at work, and that is the main advantage of this share class. Two qualifications go with it. A holder who needs income has to sell units to obtain it, which is one more decision to take and sometimes at a bad moment. And the deferral is not universal: some countries tax a notional annual return whatever the distribution policy, in which case the accumulating class changes nothing.
With 5.4 billion in assets and 19 years of history, this fund has the size and the record that make closure unlikely and the spread narrow. Three checks remain, once a year, none of which depends on the market. The ongoing charge, which an issuer revises without notice and whose gap to a competitor can invert. The tracking difference, the only figure that says whether replication stays faithful, currently 0.38 points against 0.12% of fees. And the methodology of MSCI Japan, which can change its selection or weighting rules without the fund's name moving, in which case what you hold has changed with nothing to announce it.
MSCI Japan covers a single country, which concentrates three risks at once: its economy, its currency and its sector structure, since a national index reflects the country's industrial history rather than a chosen balance. A country position therefore makes sense to complete an already diversified portfolio, rarely to build one. The question to settle before buying is currency: a return published in one currency and real exposure to another diverge over several years, and a currency-hedged fund answers a different question, at the price of hedging costs that vary with the interest rate gap.
The published returns for this fund are incomplete, and that is itself information: without a multi-year record, the only available check is the structure, the 0.12% ongoing charge, 5.4 billion in assets and the replication method. A recent or little-followed fund is not a bad fund for that reason, but it can only be judged on what is known in advance rather than on what it has done.
0.12%
TD: +0.38%5.4B
5,375M USDMedium
279
Physical
Accumulating
USD
LU
MSCI Japan
Xtrackers
2007-01-09 (19 years)
Contextual Analysis
Fund Size
With 5.4B in assets, this is a large fund, good liquidity and tight spreads.
Fee Positioning
A TER of 0.12% is among the lowest on the market, excellent value.
Track Record
Launched in 2007-01-09, this fund has 19 years of history, long and reliable track record.
Risk Profile
Medium risk, good risk/return balance for a 5+ year horizon.
Performance
Returns Summary
| Period | Ann. Return | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Month (est.) | – | +1.6% |
| 3 Months (est.) | – | +4.8% |
| 6 Months (est.) | – | +9.8% |
| YTD (est.) | – | +8.1% |
| 1 Year | +20.6% | +20.6% |
| 3 Years | – | – |
| 5 Years | – | – |
| Since inception (19y) | +20.6% | +3417.9% |
Key Facts
Fund Profile
Themes & Zones
Holdings
Risk
How to Buy This ETF
Select your country in the menu to see available brokers and wrappers.
About this ETF
The Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C tracks the MSCI Japan index. It is managed by Xtrackers using physical replication and follows a accumulating distribution policy. The fund is denominated in USD and domiciled in LU. It has a total expense ratio (TER) of 0.12%.
Similar ETFs
Frequently asked questions
What do XMJP's 0.12% charges actually cost?
They are taken from the fund's value continuously and never billed separately: on £1,000 invested that is about £1.20 a year and roughly £12 over ten years at a constant amount. That is the only cost of the fund itself. Your broker's commission and the spread between buying and selling price come on top, and they weigh most on small frequent purchases.
What currency risk comes with XMJP?
The fund is denominated in USD, but the trading currency is not the risk: what counts is the currency in which the companies held earn their revenue. A euro-based investor therefore carries the gap between the euro and those currencies, and that gap appears in no return published in local currency. A hedged share class answers a different question, at a cost that varies with the interest rate gap.
How do you buy XMJP, and on which venue?
Through any broker that lists ISIN LU0274209740. The same strategy often exists in several share classes with different fees and distribution policies, and what counts is the class you buy rather than the one you read about: check the ISIN, not the name. A limit order avoids paying the spread of a thin order book, particularly outside the trading hours of the underlying markets.
Is XMJP genuinely diversified?
Less so than the number of holdings suggests. MSCI Japan weights its constituents by market capitalisation, so the largest companies make up a share of the fund far above their number, and that concentration deepens without any rule changing. The useful check is the weight of the top ten holdings, published monthly by Xtrackers: that figure says how many companies the outcome actually depends on.
What should you re-check on XMJP once a year?
Three things, none of which depends on the market. The ongoing charge, which an issuer revises without notice and whose gap to a competitor can invert. The tracking difference, the only figure that says whether replication stays faithful. And the methodology of MSCI Japan, which can change its selection or weighting rules without the fund's name moving: in that case what you hold has changed with nothing to announce it.
This ranking is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Displayed performance is simulated.