Skip to content

Search

Search ETFs, guides and pages

All categories

Emerging Markets

Published by Radif Partners · Updated

MSCI EM, FTSE EM, access growth in China, India, Brazil, Taiwan and more

This page compares 18 funds in the Emerging Markets category, with ongoing charges from 0.08% to 0.74% and a median of 0.21%. The gap between the cheapest and the dearest is worth roughly €660 over ten years on €10,000 invested: for a comparable index, that is the most reliable difference between two funds, because it rests on no assumption about markets. 6 of the 18 funds are accumulating and 17 replicate their index by holding its securities, the others using a swap. The largest fund in the list is VWO, which matters less for returns than for the risk of closure: a fund that stays small usually ends up merged. Past performance is not used to rank this list: over the horizons published it says more about the index being tracked than about how the fund is run.

ETFs

18

Avg TER

0.33%

Avg Perf 1Y

+12.9%

Lowest TER

0.08%

Best 1Y

+39.5%

#ETF
1
VWOVanguard

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF

2
IEMGiShares

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

3
EIMIiShares

iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

4
EEMiShares

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

5
XMMEXtrackers

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C

6
SCHESchwab

Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF

7
EWZiShares

iShares MSCI Brazil ETF

8
HMEFHSBC

HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD

9
VFEMVanguard

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing

10
IMAEiShares

iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

11
SUESiSharesESG

iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

12
LTAMiShares

iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

13
JGEMJPMorgan

JPMorgan EM Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

14
XMEMXtrackersESG

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG UCITS ETF 1C

15
PAEEMAmundiPEA

Amundi PEA MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Acc

16
IBZLiShares

iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

17
EZAiShares

iShares MSCI South Africa ETF

18
TURiShares

iShares MSCI Turkey ETF

Why two emerging-market funds diverge so much

The emerging universe is the most heterogeneous of the major indices. MSCI Emerging Markets gathers around twenty countries, yet China, Taiwan, India and Korea concentrate more than seventy per cent of it, and a single Taiwanese semiconductor company regularly accounts for more than eight. Some indices exclude South Korea, which FTSE classifies as developed; others treat Chinese shares differently depending on where they list, A shares in Shanghai, H shares in Hong Kong, ADRs in New York. These classification choices explain gaps of several points a year between two funds filed under the same label.

The second gap comes from replication. Several emerging markets cap foreign ownership or tax capital gains heavily, which pushes some funds towards synthetic replication or optimised sampling rather than holding every constituent. Tracking difference improves or worsens accordingly from year to year, and it is read in the annual report, not on the factsheet. For a portfolio the prior question remains the weight to give: emerging markets are about ten per cent of an all-country world index, and many portfolios overweight them without having decided to.

What the funds in this category show

Where the money actually sits

The category holds 18 funds and 467.1B in combined assets, and those assets are not spread evenly. Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO), run by Vanguard, holds 164.7B on its own, and the three largest, Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO), iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EIMI), account for 79.5 % of the total. At the other end, iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR) manages only 163M. Size is no guarantee of quality, but it decides two very concrete things: the spread between buying and selling price you pay on every order, and the odds that the fund still exists in ten years.

The fee gap, in money

Ongoing charges run from 0.08 % for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) to 0.74 % for iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBZL), a gap of 0.66 points, against a category average of 0.33 %. On £10,000 held for ten years that gap is roughly 660 in extra charges, before counting the return that money would itself have earned. It is the one variable in the comparison known in advance: past performance does not repeat, fees repeat every year.

Two funds in one category do not hold the same basket

The 18 funds listed track 13 different indices, among them FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion, MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market, MSCI Emerging Markets and FTSE Emerging Index. The largest tracks FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion. That spread is why two funds filed under the same theme can differ by several points over a year: they hold different securities, weight them differently and rebalance on different dates. Each fund page names its index, and that is where a serious comparison starts.

Replication and domicile

17 funds hold the constituents of their index directly, 1 use a swap, including Amundi PEA MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Acc (PAEEM) from Amundi. Synthetic replication often tracks more closely and reaches markets that are hard to hold directly, at the price of a counterparty risk that is regulated but real. Physical replication is easier to understand and allows securities lending, which earns the fund income and adds its own risk.

10 of the 18 funds are domiciled in IE, the rest in US and FR. Domicile sets the withholding tax the fund itself suffers on the dividends it receives, a cost absent from the stated fee but present in the return, and it also sets your own tax treatment depending on where you live.

Accumulate or take the income

6 funds accumulate dividends, 12 pay them out. The largest accumulating share class is iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EIMI), the largest distributing one Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). The choice is not about yield, both versions of the same index return the same before tax, but about tax and discipline: the accumulating class reinvests with no cost and no decision, the distributing class pays income that is taxable in the year it arrives.

Age and critical size

The oldest fund in the category, iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ), launched on 2000-07-10, giving 26 years of history, and the newest, Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XMEM), on 2022-12-14. A long record shows how the fund behaved in a fall, which no one-year number can. A fund launched two years ago has lived through a single market regime.

None of the 18 funds manages under 100 million, the smallest being iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR). The category is therefore clear of closure risk for want of size, the risk that forces a sale on the issuer's timetable rather than the holder's.

Frequently asked questions

What are Emerging Markets ETFs?

Emerging Markets ETFs invest in developing economies like China, India, Taiwan, Brazil, and South Korea. They offer higher growth potential but come with higher volatility and political risk. Check the figure in the key information document of the exact share class your broker offers, since two classes of the same fund can differ on charges and on distribution policy.

What percentage should I allocate to Emerging Markets?

Most financial advisors suggest 10-20% of an equity portfolio in Emerging Markets, depending on your risk tolerance and investment horizon. Emerging Markets represent ~12% of global market cap. What matters more than the ranking is whether the underlying index suits your horizon and your tolerance for a fall of thirty per cent, which no score can decide for you.

Which is better: MSCI EM or FTSE EM?

The main difference is that FTSE classifies South Korea as a developed market, while MSCI includes it in Emerging Markets. This affects country weights, particularly Korea's ~12% weight in MSCI EM. Past performance over these horizons says more about the index than about the fund, which is why the comparison here weighs cost, size and tracking quality instead.

Are Emerging Markets ETFs riskier?

Yes, Emerging Markets ETFs typically have higher volatility (20-25% annualized) compared to developed market ETFs (15-18%). They also carry currency, political, and regulatory risks. Over a ten-year horizon the ongoing charge weighs more than any difference in past performance: 0.20% against 0.50% on €10,000 is about €300, compounded.