Skip to content

Search

Search ETFs, guides and pages

HPAJ

HSBC·MSCI Pacific ex Japan

HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF USD

Published by Radif Partners · Updated

IE00B5SG8Z87
TER 0.15%18M AUMUSDPhysicalDistUCITS
Simulate
+14.2%
1Y
+21.0%
3Y
–5Y

Overview

HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (HPAJ) tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan index and holds its constituents directly, a physical replication managed by HSBC. Dividends are paid out to holders rather than reinvested, so HPAJ suits investors seeking regular income. The fund is domiciled in IE, which determines the withholding tax treatment applied to its dividends. Annual charges come to 0.15% of assets, and the fund holds 18M under management. Over the past year the fund returned 14.2%, a history too short to judge it on. It is not eligible for the French PEA, but can be held in a securities account, a UK ISA or a German Depot. Its risk level is rated medium. Launched on 2011-01-12, the fund is denominated in USD and has 15 years of track record. It is a UCITS fund, so it follows the European framework on diversification, liquidity and asset segregation. Because HPAJ distributes, every payment is taxable in the year it is received, against the dividend allowance in a general account, while it stays sheltered inside an ISA or a SIPP. Domicile in IE sets the withholding the fund itself suffers on the dividends it receives, a cost absent from the stated fee but present in the return.

Ongoing charges of 0.15% place this fund 78th of 225 comparable funds, whose median is 0.20%. On £10,000 that costs about 15 a year and 150 over ten years at a constant amount, deducted daily and never visible on a statement: it shows up in the gap between the fund's return and its index's. At this level, neither low enough to be an argument nor high enough to be an obstacle, the decision rests elsewhere: on the index tracked, on the distribution policy, and on what your broker charges to buy.

Replication is physical: the fund actually holds the constituents of MSCI Pacific ex Japan, which makes its contents verifiable line by line in the issuer's report. Two points deserve attention. Securities lending first, practised by most physical funds to reduce costs: it earns a few hundredths of a point and creates an exposure to the borrower, covered by collateral, with the annual report stating the proportion lent. Rebalancing second: every change in the index's composition forces the fund to buy and sell, and those internal costs are not in the 0.15% headline. That is why two funds at the same price do not track their index with the same fidelity.

The domicile, Ireland, is not an administrative detail: it determines the withholding tax the fund suffers on the dividends it receives, and that loss appears in no fee table. On US equities, the Ireland-US treaty cuts withholding from thirty to fifteen per cent, which on a world index is mechanically worth several tenths of a point a year and explains Irish dominance of this segment. For the holder, the UCITS framework also brings the key information document in their own language, diversification rules, and separation of the fund's assets from the issuer's.

Income is distributed: the fund pays out the dividends it receives, usually one to four times a year. For a holder living off the portfolio that is what is wanted, since the income arrives without selling. For someone still accumulating it is a tax disadvantage in a taxable account: each payment is taxed in the year received, so the amount reinvested is reduced before it starts working again. Reinvesting by hand also costs a dealing commission each time and often leaves cash idle for want of the price of a whole unit. An accumulating class on the same index, where one exists, settles the question.

At 18 million in assets, this fund is small, and size is the main risk here, ahead of the index's volatility. A fund that stays below its issuer's viability threshold ends up merged or wound up, and both happen without your consent: liquidation forces a sale on a date you did not choose, hence a taxable gain at the wrong moment, and a merger moves you to an index that is not quite the one you picked. Assets falling year after year are the signal to watch, more than the absolute level. At this size the spread between buying and selling price is also wider, which costs on every order.

MSCI Pacific ex Japan covers a single country, which concentrates three risks at once: its economy, its currency and its sector structure, since a national index reflects the country's industrial history rather than a chosen balance. A country position therefore makes sense to complete an already diversified portfolio, rarely to build one. The question to settle before buying is currency: a return published in one currency and real exposure to another diverge over several years, and a currency-hedged fund answers a different question, at the price of hedging costs that vary with the interest rate gap.

The published returns for this fund are incomplete, and that is itself information: without a multi-year record, the only available check is the structure, the 0.15% ongoing charge, 18 million in assets and the replication method. A recent or little-followed fund is not a bad fund for that reason, but it can only be judged on what is known in advance rather than on what it has done.

TER

0.15%

Fund Size

18M

18M USD
Risk Level

Medium

Holdings

277

Replication

Physical

Distribution

Distributing

Currency

USD

Domicile

IE

Index

MSCI Pacific ex Japan

Provider

HSBC

Inception

2011-01-12 (15 years)

Compliance
UCITS

Contextual Analysis

Fund Size

With 18M in assets, this is a small fund, watch out for spreads and closure risk.

Fee Positioning

A TER of 0.15% is among the lowest on the market, excellent value.

Track Record

Launched in 2011-01-12, this fund has 15 years of history, long and reliable track record.

Risk Profile

Medium risk, good risk/return balance for a 5+ year horizon.

Performance

Returns Summary

PeriodAnn. ReturnCumulative
1 Month (est.)–+1.1%
3 Months (est.)–+3.4%
6 Months (est.)–+6.9%
YTD (est.)–+5.7%
1 Year+14.2%+14.2%
3 Years+21.0%+77.3%
5 Years––
Since inception (15y)+17.6%+1040.1%

Key Facts

Fund Profile

IndexMSCI Pacific ex Japan
TER0.15%
Fund Size18M
CurrencyUSD
ReplicationPhysical
DistributionDistributing
DomicileIE
Inception2011-01-12
Fund Age15 years
Holdings277
UCITSYes
PEA EligibleNo
ESGNo
Risk LevelMedium

Themes & Zones

Themes
Broad Market
Geographies
Asia Pacific

Holdings

Risk

How to Buy This ETF

Select your country in the menu to see available brokers and wrappers.

About this ETF

The HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF USD tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan index. It is managed by HSBC using physical replication and follows a distributing distribution policy. The fund is denominated in USD and domiciled in IE. It has a total expense ratio (TER) of 0.15%.

Want to see how this ETF could grow over time with regular investments? Over a ten-year horizon the ongoing charge weighs more than any difference in past performance: 0.20% against 0.50% on €10,000 is about €300, compounded. Check the figure in the key information document of the exact share class your broker offers, since two classes of the same fund can differ on charges and on distribution policy.Simulate

Similar ETFs

Frequently asked questions

What do HPAJ's 0.15% charges actually cost?

They are taken from the fund's value continuously and never billed separately: on £1,000 invested that is about £1.50 a year and roughly £15 over ten years at a constant amount. That is the only cost of the fund itself. Your broker's commission and the spread between buying and selling price come on top, and they weigh most on small frequent purchases.

Does HPAJ lend out the securities it holds?

Probably in part: most physical funds lend securities to reduce their costs, and HSBC publishes the proportion in the annual report. Lending income is worth a few hundredths of a point, shared between the fund and the issuer. The risk is the borrower's, covered by collateral worth more than the amount lent, and it appears in the prospectus rather than in the stated fee.

Why does HPAJ's Irish domicile matter?

Because it determines the withholding tax the fund suffers on the dividends it receives, and that loss appears in no fee table. The Ireland-US treaty cuts withholding from thirty to fifteen per cent on US equities, mechanically worth several tenths of a point a year on a world index. The UCITS framework also brings the key information document in your own language.

Does HPAJ pay dividends?

Yes: the fund distributes and pays out the dividends it receives, on a calendar set by HSBC. The payment is taxable in the year you receive it in most accounts, even if reinvested at once, and reinvesting by hand costs a commission each time. An accumulating class on the same index avoids that friction for anyone who does not need the income.

What happens if HPAJ closes?

At 18 million in assets, this fund is small enough for a merger or a wind-up to be a real prospect. On liquidation the holdings are sold and the proceeds paid to you on a date you did not choose, so with a gain that may be taxable at the wrong moment. On a merger your units move to another fund whose index is not quite the one you picked.

This ranking is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Displayed performance is simulated.