Global Equity (World)
Published by Radif Partners · Updated
MSCI World, FTSE All-World, ACWI, broad exposure to developed markets worldwide
This page compares 55 funds in the Global Equity (World) category, with ongoing charges from 0.05% to 0.50% and a median of 0.25%. The gap between the cheapest and the dearest is worth roughly €450 over ten years on €10,000 invested: for a comparable index, that is the most reliable difference between two funds, because it rests on no assumption about markets. 35 of the 55 funds are accumulating and 50 replicate their index by holding its securities, the others using a swap. The largest fund in the list is VXUS, which matters less for returns than for the risk of closure: a fund that stays small usually ends up merged. Past performance is not used to rank this list: over the horizons published it says more about the index being tracked than about how the fund is run.
55
0.24%
+12.8%
0.05%
+41.2%
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Schwab International Equity ETF
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
Dimensional International Value ETF
Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C
SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company ETF
iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1D
iShares MSCI Canada ETF
Xtrackers MSCI World ESG UCITS ETF 1C
Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C
Amundi MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF EUR Acc
Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist
iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
Xtrackers MSCI World Value UCITS ETF 1C
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
Amundi MSCI World SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (C)
Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR Acc
Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C
Amundi PEA MSCI World UCITS ETF - EUR Acc
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C
L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF
Invesco MSCI World ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc
Franklin FTSE World UCITS ETF Acc
Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR Dist
Xtrackers MSCI World Equal Weighted UCITS ETF 1C
Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C
iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C
Invesco FTSE RAFI All-World 3000 UCITS ETF
UBS ETF MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF
SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
What a world index covers, and what it leaves out
A world equity index does not hold the world: it holds the large and mid-cap companies of countries classified as developed, roughly 1,500 holdings and 85 % of the free float of those markets. The United States accounts for around seventy per cent of it, not by a manager's choice but because weighting follows market capitalisation. Emerging markets are absent unless the index is an ACWI or IMI variant, which add emerging markets and small caps respectively. Two funds both sold as global can therefore cover very different universes, and it is the index name, not the fund name, that says which.
The practical consequence is that a portfolio built on a single world fund is already diversified across sectors and companies, but not across currencies or economic regimes: a decade of American underperformance would show up directly in its return. Adding an emerging-market or small-cap fund changes the profile at the margin, a few points of weight, whereas adding bonds changes it materially. That is why the useful question is not which world fund to pick, since the gap between the large ones is a few hundredths in fees, but how much of the portfolio to give it.
What the funds in this category show
Where the money actually sits
The category holds 55 funds and 2114.2B in combined assets, and those assets are not spread evenly. Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS), run by Vanguard, holds 649.3B on its own, and the three largest, Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS), Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA), account for 54.5 % of the total. At the other end, SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (SPYY) manages only 9M. Size is no guarantee of quality, but it decides two very concrete things: the spread between buying and selling price you pay on every order, and the odds that the fund still exists in ten years.
The fee gap, in money
Ongoing charges run from 0.05 % for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) to 0.50 % for iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC), a gap of 0.45 points, against a category average of 0.24 %. On £10,000 held for ten years that gap is roughly 450 in extra charges, before counting the return that money would itself have earned. It is the one variable in the comparison known in advance: past performance does not repeat, fees repeat every year.
Two funds in one category do not hold the same basket
The 55 funds listed track 37 different indices, among them FTSE Global All Cap ex US, FTSE Developed All Cap ex US, MSCI EAFE Investable Market and MSCI World. The largest tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US. That spread is why two funds filed under the same theme can differ by several points over a year: they hold different securities, weight them differently and rebalance on different dates. Each fund page names its index, and that is where a serious comparison starts.
Replication and domicile
50 funds hold the constituents of their index directly, 5 use a swap, including Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMWO) from Xtrackers. Synthetic replication often tracks more closely and reaches markets that are hard to hold directly, at the price of a counterparty risk that is regulated but real. Physical replication is easier to understand and allows securities lending, which earns the fund income and adds its own risk.
36 of the 55 funds are domiciled in IE, the rest in US, LU and FR. Domicile sets the withholding tax the fund itself suffers on the dividends it receives, a cost absent from the stated fee but present in the return, and it also sets your own tax treatment depending on where you live.
Accumulate or take the income
35 funds accumulate dividends, 20 pay them out. The largest accumulating share class is iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA), the largest distributing one Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The choice is not about yield, both versions of the same index return the same before tax, but about tax and discipline: the accumulating class reinvests with no cost and no decision, the distributing class pays income that is taxable in the year it arrives.
Age and critical size
The oldest fund in the category, iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC), launched on 1996-03-12, giving 30 years of history, and the newest, Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR Acc (MWRD), on 2024-03-06. A long record shows how the fund behaved in a fall, which no one-year number can. A fund launched two years ago has lived through a single market regime.
1 of the 55 funds manage under 100 million, among them SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (SPYY). Below that level a fund rarely pays for its issuer, and a closure forces a sale on the issuer's timetable rather than yours, with capital gains tax along the way.
Frequently asked questions
What is a World ETF?
A World ETF tracks a global equity index like MSCI World or FTSE All-World, giving you diversified exposure to over 1,500 companies across developed markets in a single fund. Check the figure in the key information document of the exact share class your broker offers, since two classes of the same fund can differ on charges and on distribution policy.
Which is better: MSCI World or FTSE All-World?
MSCI World covers only developed markets (~23 countries), while FTSE All-World includes emerging markets too. FTSE All-World offers broader diversification but slightly more volatility. What matters more than the ranking is whether the underlying index suits your horizon and your tolerance for a fall of thirty per cent, which no score can decide for you.
What is a good TER for a World ETF?
The best World ETFs have TERs between 0.12% and 0.22%. Anything above 0.40% is considered expensive for a passive global tracker. Past performance over these horizons says more about the index than about the fund, which is why the comparison here weighs cost, size and tracking quality instead.
Should I choose accumulating or distributing?
Accumulating ETFs reinvest dividends automatically, which is generally more tax-efficient for long-term growth. Distributing ETFs pay dividends to your account, which suits income-focused investors. Over a ten-year horizon the ongoing charge weighs more than any difference in past performance: 0.20% against 0.50% on €10,000 is about €300, compounded.